Media & Medicine

I’m an introvert. I recently took an online Myers-Briggs test a work colleague sent me, and I scored a solid INTJ. This categorization has been stable for me since high school. Though I do enjoy social events and meeting new people, as a true introvert, I find conferences exhausting. Medical or otherwise, the constant introductions, social navigating, and personal storytelling involved can prove daunting.

Last April, I was in Boston at a medical conference and had lunch with a group of women physicians. I struck up a conversation with the woman sitting next to me, trading the standard questions: where we’re from, our medical specialty, our interests. I told her about my passion for writing and narrative medicine and storytelling and physician wellness and bioethics and the humanities and, in turn, heard all about her upcoming book and the wonderful work she was doing in Boston.

A month later she emailed me, saying she had just attended a narrative writing event at her hospital, run by Dr. Suzanne Koven, and that what Dr. Koven was doing seemed very much aligned with my interests and the work I hoped to do in Seattle. Would I like a virtual introduction?

And that, as they say, is history. At least for my work and life. I spent over an hour speaking with Suzanne, learning about her path in both medicine and writing, and how she formed the Literature & Medicine program that has been running for over a decade. I knew I’d like Suzanne immediately when her first words to me were, “Well, let’s discuss our mutual favorite topic: narrative medicine.”

Under Suzanne’s guidance, I went on to establish a Literature & Medicine program at my own institution in Seattle, and she has since become Massachusetts General Hospital’s first Writer-in-Residence.

So when I heard that she and Neal Baer were starting a Media & Medicine course at Harvard, looking at how we can use storytelling to address pressing public health issues, I knew I wanted to be involved.

This past week, the inaugural Media & Medicine class met together in Boston for five days of lectures and networking, community and conversation. With a cohort of 50 people from all over the world, there was rich discussion and consideration of how we can use journalism and podcasting, op-eds and plays to address issues in healthcare.

I was impressed with the many innovative ideas, including implementing design thinking to tackle complex healthcare problems, weaving public health education into television and plays, and using solutions journalism to show that “better is possible” to enact change. Keynote speaker Dr. Leana Wen urged us to start with our authentic selves and stick with the voice we know. We collectively wrote op-ed pitches, practiced playback theater techniques, critiqued podcasts, and turned partner stories into playdough and pipe cleaner art.

I met an impressive group of healthcare professionals from all over the world, eager to expand on work in public health, mental health, health disparities, physician wellness, and chronic disease. We learned from each other, advised each other, helped with networking solutions and built our own community of advocates for storytelling and listening, which we’ll continue to grow over the next six months as we work on specific public health projects.

I had so many rich conversations, and heard from experts in media and storytelling. I’m leaving Boston invigorated and exhausted. I can’t wait to work on my own project, focusing on mental illness, and support and champion the work of my fellow colleagues. Although taxing for introverts like me, I’m so glad I had that conversation, shared my story with the women physicians I met at that conference back in 2018. It speaks to the power of personal connection, of telling our stories with vulnerability and hope, and this, I think, is what the Media & Medicine program is all about.

Continue Reading

Narrative Medicine Monday: Having and Fighting Ebola

I wrote yesterday about how I attended a summer institute in Paris that focused on health beyond borders. The final keynote speaker was Dr. Craig Spencer, who shared his work rescuing and treating migrants in the Mediterranean.

Dr. Spencer has worked extensively in global health, and in 2015 wrote an essay published in The New England Journal of Medicine about contracting Ebola when he was treating patients in Guinea. He was a clinician who became a patient, fighting for his life.

In Spencer’s piece, he outlines how the “Ebola treatment center in Guéckédou, Guinea, was the most challenging place I’ve ever worked.” Though there was no clear breach of protocol, Spencer still returned home having contracted Ebola, becoming “New York City’s first Ebola patient.” Spencer shares both the anxiety and compassion he felt in caring for patients with Ebola: “Difficult decisions were the norm: for many patients, there were no applicable algorithms or best-practice guidelines.”

Dr. Spencer shares how, back in New York, after “the suffering I’d seen, combined with exhaustion, made me feel depressed for the first time in my life.” Though immediately presenting to the hospital the moment he exhibited any sign of illness or elevated temperature, Spencer is vilified in the media, his activities upon returning home scrutinized and “highly criticized…. People excoriated me for going out in the city when I was symptomatic, but I hadn’t been symptomatic — just sad. I was labeled a fraud, a hipster, and a hero. The truth is I am none of those things. I’m just someone who answered a call for help and was lucky enough to survive.”

Spencer calls out the panic that ensued after his diagnosis, how politicians “took advantage… to try to appear presidential instead of supporting a sound, science-based public health response.” He points out that “At times of threat to our public health, we need one pragmatic response, not 50 viewpoints that shift with the proximity of the next election. Moreover, if the U.S. public policy response undermined efforts to send more volunteers to West Africa, and thus allowed the outbreak to continue longer than it might have, we would all be culpable.” Spencer notes not only the misguided response to his own infection, but also the ripple effects this policy could have had on the outbreak worldwide. His is a cautionary tale of how a response to any public health situation must be grounded in steady pragmatism and based in scientific fact. Lives depend on it.

Writing Prompt: Dr. Spencer shares how, after witnessing significant suffering through his work with Ebola patients, he felt “depressed for the first time in my life.” If you are a medical provider, have you experienced similar secondary trauma? How did this manifest? Where did you find support? Alternatively, consider that Spencer urges us to “overcome” fear. Reflect on what you are fearful of, from a public health standpoint or otherwise. Is it a rational or irrational fear? How might it be overcome? Write for 10 minutes.

Continue Reading