Narrative Medicine Monday: Burnout in Healthcare

I’ve wanted to attend Columbia’s Narrative Medicine workshops for years. Life finally aligned to make that possible this past weekend as I joined professionals from different disciplines gathered to address “Burnout in Health Care: The Need for Narrative.” As a wellness champion for my physician group, this year’s topic was particularly pertinent to my work and practice.

The conference consisted of lectures from leaders in the field of narrative medicine alternating with small group breakout sessions. I was fortunate enough to have Dr. Rita Charon, who inaugurated the field of narrative medicine, facilitate two of my group’s sessions, which consisted of close reading and reflective writing and sharing. This format allows for in depth discussion with medical and humanities professionals, as well as time for introspection about how best to expand on learned concepts and practices when we return home.

Several takeaways for me:

Narrative can be used to address many issues in healthcare, burnout among them. I’ve been facilitating a Literature & Medicine program for my own physician group, and have taught narrative medicine small group sessions to resident physicians, but am inspired to do more of this work to expand the reach to medical professionals and patients. Dr. Charon encouraged us to disseminate the skills deepened through the humanities, that these are what’s missing from a health care system that has become depersonalized. Skills learned through narrative medicine can improve team cohesion, address moral injury and bias.

Writer Nellie Herman offered Viktor Frankel’s words: the primary force of an individual is to find meaning in life. Herman showed us how writing can help us find that meaning, giving shape to our experiences, our memories. Harnessing creativity can be particularly important for those of us who experience moral injury because “when we write, we externalize what is inside us.” Through writing and sharing, we’re making a commitment to something, a raw, less mediated version of events. Through this vulnerability we connect to others; though difficult, that’s what makes it valuable.

Dr. Kelley Skeff approaches burnout and narrative from a physician educator’s perspective. It is not lost on anyone who has been a medical resident or trained them that “we have trained people to take care of patients, even if it kills them. We have trained people to keep quiet.” Skeff offers us this quote from Richard Gunderman: “Professional burnout is the sum total of hundreds and thousands of tiny betrayals of purpose, each one so minute that it hardly attracts notice.” He implores us to combat the code of silence and ask ourselves and each other: What’s distressing you?

Maura Spiegel contends that “narrative language can proliferate meaning.” Spiegel used film clips to show how we can gain access to our own experience. In watching a film, we’re not called upon to respond, but we are often running our own parallel stories along with the movie. Spiegel showed clips from the movies “Moonlight,” “Ikiru,” and “Philadelphia,” and the documentary “The Waiting Room.” In that final clip we saw a young doctor run a code in the Emergency Room where a teenage boy dies. He then is tasked with telling the family the devastating news. He seeks out support from his colleagues on how to do this. Spiegel notes a quote from Jonathan Shay: “Recovery happens only in community.”

I was bolstered to hear about he the work of Craig Irvine and Dr. Deepu Gowda, who discussed how to create a culture for narrative work, both in academic institutions and in clinics. Dr. Gowda explored using narrative medicine sessions with the entire medical team (including nursing staff, administrators, physicians) and found improved teamwork, collaboration, and communication. Both suggested building a team of people interested in narrative work, be they art historians, philosophers, writers, physicians, or psychologists.

More than anything, this workshop churned up ideas and inspired methods that could be used at my own workplace to use narrative work to address burnout. I came away encouraged and connected to colleagues who are interested in the same questions and in addressing the daunting problem we face in our current health care system. Ultimately, we want to “allow voices to be heard, and address suffering, not only of patients but also of medical providers.” This work is challenging, but necessary. As Tavis Apramian noted in the final lecture of the conference, “the meaning that we draw from other people is the reason to keep going.” That it is. I hope to continue learning about this important work and am grateful for the faculty at Columbia who inspire tributaries (or rhizomes!) of narrative and creativity throughout the medical world.

Continue Reading

Narrative Medicine Monday: How Storytelling Can Help Young Doctors Become More Resilient

Physician and author Dr. Jessica Zitter shows “How Storytelling Can Help Young Doctors Become More Resilient” in her recent essay in the Harvard Business Review. We know that this issue is vital to increasingly stretched and stressed medical providers, the consequences of which are discussed in previous Narrative Medicine Monday posts here and here. I wrote a short piece in Pulse for their “Stress and Burnout” issue that outlines a typical day for a modern primary care physician and have also studied and taught narrative medicine as a tool to better care for our patients and ourselves. Zitter has a unique perspective on the particular challenges for physicians and patients in end of life care, given she is board certified in both critical care and palliative care medicine.

Zitter addresses this issue through a “new program which uses storytelling to help young doctors reflect on how they handle the emotional and psychological toll of caring for suffering patients.” She opens up to a group of new physicians about running the code of a young woman in the ICU, the resistance to letting a patient go, even when nothing remains other than suffering: “We are expected to be brave, confident, and above all, to never give up.  And all the more so in particular cases, such as when a patient is young, previously healthy, or has a condition that appears reversible on admission. And in cases when our well-intended but risky interventions might have actually made things worse, it is almost impossible to let go.”

When the experienced Zitter suggests that they instead institute pain management and sedation rather than attempt resuscitation the next time her heart stops, the physicians-in-training bristle. She questions a culture that promotes doing everything, including “this technique, that intervention, a whole host of options that would never have saved this woman.” Zitter admits she gives in to the other physicians, decides to fight “to the end, the way real heroes do.” The result is tragic. “The patient died a terrible death.”

Zitter reflects on this experience and shares it in the hope that it will help other young physicians who will certainly encounter the same, given that our culture and medical training makes it so “we often feel unable to question or diverge from scripted approaches — ones which may actually cause more suffering than benefit.”

To combat this, Zitter looks to storytelling, asserting that “[d]ata show that the use of stories to process the challenging experience of being a doctor increases empathy, enhances wellness and resilience, and promotes a more humanistic health care culture.” After Zitter shares her story with the group, others begin opening up about their own experiences and a “genuine conversation proceeded, one which addressed the emotional pitfalls and psychological challenges of this work.”

Zitter is also part of a 2016 Netflix documentary called “Extremis.” This short film takes a hard look at the grueling decisions patients’ families, and the physicians who inform them, make near the end of life in the ICU. In it, you can appreciate the need to “provide safe spaces for healthcare professionals to reflect on and process their own suffering. Then we will be fully available to do the hard work of patient-centered decision making in the moments when it is really needed — at the bedside of a dying patient.”

Writing Prompt:  Have you had to help make decisions for a patient who is critically ill in the ICU? What issues came up? How was your interaction with the medical team that cared for your loved one? Alternatively, consider watching the short documentary “Extremis” and write about a moment that struck you or perhaps changed your way of thinking about end of life care. If you’re a medical professional, think of a time you witnessed an end of life situation when the patient experienced more suffering than was necessary. Do you agree that our culture contributes to performing “risky interventions” that “might have actually made things worse,” because we insist on fighting “to the end, the way real heroes do?” How do you think sharing such stories might promote wellness? Consider writing about a challenging situation from the perspective of the attending doctor, the resident, the patient, the nurse, the family member. Write for 10 minutes.

Continue Reading

Narrative Medicine Monday: Caring for Ms. L

Dr. Audrey Provenzano explores the difficulties in treating opioid use disorder in The New England Journal of Medicine‘s “Caring for Ms. L.” Provenzano has already developed rapport with Ms. L when one day the patient admits to her doctor that she had “taken a few of the oxycodone pills prescribed for her husband… [a]nd like a swimmer pulled into the undertow, she was dragged back into the cold, dark brine of addiction.” Ms. L is eager to try a treatment called buprenorphine but Provenzano doesn’t have the special license or training to prescribe the medication. Ms. L expresses disappointment at needing to establish care with a different provider. She trusts her doctor and doesn’t want to tell anyone else about her addiction.

Provenzano confesses that “the reason I didn’t have a waiver to prescribe buprenorphine was that I didn’t want one…. Every Friday I left the office utterly depleted, devoid of the energy or motivation it would take to spend a weekend clicking through the required online training.” She admits that more than anything, she avoids the training because she “did not want to deal with patients who needed it.” Provenzano had witnessed the toll addiction can take on a patient’s relationships and life and “[a]lready overwhelmed, I did not want to take on patients with needs that I did not know how to meet.”

Most primary care physicians can relate to Provenzano. There is already an alarming amount of burnout that exists among today’s physicians; the thought of adding another degree of complexity seems untenable to most, especially if it seems the therapeutic need is insurmountable.

Provenzano notes, though, that when Ms. L returns to her for diabetes treatment after seeing a colleague for the buprenorphine “a space had opened between us.” Ms. L doesn’t return for follow up and it is a year later that Provenzano learns that Ms. L died of an overdose. Provenzano experiences a “profound sadness” for Ms. L’s family, though “it was the shame that kept me awake.” She can’t help thinking that, given the strong patient-physician relationship they had previously developed, if Provenzano had treated Ms. L herself things might have turned out differently.

Provenzano goes on to get buprenorphine training and experiences both the therapeutic and complex social aspects of managing patients with opioid use disorder. She advocates for moving beyond just the training needed to prescribe medications for this chronic disease, but also urges us to “recognize, name, and talk about the social issues that must be addressed” and establish “team-based behavioral health and social work resources.”

Provenzano eventually finds treating patients with opioid use disorder “the most meaningful part of my practice.” She ultimately experiences great satisfaction in providing some normalcy to patients who are “roiled by overdose and estrangement.” Have you experienced the same?

Writing Prompt: As a patient, can you understand or appreciate Dr. Provenzano’s hesitation at first? If you’re a physician, have you experienced a similar hesitation? If you’ve suffered from addiction, what has been the most therapeutic intervention you’ve received? Think about an experience with addiction, either on a personal level or with a patient, that was particularly difficult. Then consider an interaction or moment that was a breakthrough. Write for 10 minutes.

Continue Reading

Narrative Medicine Monday: The Poetry in Primary Care

Returning from vacation as a primary care physician, as any physician, can be a daunting task. I wrote a flash essay for Pulse about the intense timeline of a typical family physician’s workday. You can imagine after being gone for a week the mountain of forms, test results, and emails that accumulate. Even when you have, as I do (many don’t), supportive partners who do their best to clean out as much of the inbox as possible, there’s a particular dread and pressure that occurs for the primary care physician returning to work. In medicine, everything is connected to a patient. A response delayed, an aberrancy missed, means damage—emotional or physical—to a very real person.

It was on such a day, back to work after a week of camping and s’mores and searching for sand dollars on a Washington coast beach with my family, that I stumbled upon a poem. Our clinic is set up with exam rooms jutting in from corridors that originate like tributaries from the hallways that line the perimeter of the building. Our offices dot the exterior hallway, windows overlooking the parking lot or other buildings in the business complex.

I was walking along this exterior hallway, brisk step between patients, stuffing my stethoscope back into my stiff white coat pocket, when I was struck by a nondescript sheet of paper tacked to the bulletin board just outside our nurses’ office. “Good Bones” caught my eye, made me pause mid-stride. There were patients to examine, lab results to respond to, phone calls to make, radiographs to interpret, but I stopped and turned and read the familiar lines.

I’ve followed poet Maggie Smith’s work for some time. I find poetry alluring and intimidating. I took Michelle Penaloza’s excellent poetry class at Hugo House last fall to overcome my perplexion, but found it would take much more investment to grasp all I wanted about the craft of poetry. Smith’s work is relatable; my contemporary, a mother, an artist, her words resonate and I instantly became a fan.

But to see her here, amidst my other vocation, my medical science workday of Pap smears and skin biopsies and asthma exacerbations, was foreign, a collision of worlds. Though I’ve written about and taught narrative medicine for several years now, though I’m aware of the benefits, to both the physician and patient, of integrating the humanities into the science of medicine, I’ve still found it challenging to be present with such art during the compressive restrictions of my primary care workday. So, Smith’s poem, tacked inconspicuously along a back hallway bulletin board, among graphs of clinic access and Medicare Five Star goals and HEDIS measures and Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores, was a welcome interruption, a surprising reminder, an appropriate intermission interjected into a hectic workday.

I asked around for several days after, attempting to determine who had posted the poem of maintaining hope amidst a broken world. Though I was told it had been up for weeks, maybe months, I never did find the culprit. That same week Glennon Doyle highlighted this very poem on her social media. For me a collision of two women I admire, I’ve never met, whose good works are far from medicine, far from my little corner of primary care amidst the jutting mountains, the emerald waters of the Pacific Northwest. But the lessons, the convictions, the challenge of poetry is relevant, maybe the most relevant to my interactions with patients, my titration of insulin regimens, my diagnoses of cancer, my prescribing of antidepressants, my listening to histories to evaluate an unintentional weight loss or a shortness of breath or an abdominal distention leaving a patient in excruciating pain.

Maybe an antidote to our broken healthcare system, the crux of narrative medicine, a balm for medical professionals suffering from compassion fatigue and secondary trauma and a system that increasingly squeezes the humanity out of of its providers, rests in the complex workings, the simple act of reading poetry. There’s instruction in the words, in the art of the line break, illumination of humanity in the universal themes presented. A reminder that at the heart of medicine we serve people, we are people, we are all in this together. Poetry infuses humanity back into this most human, most intimate of professions. Medicine is a science but it is also an art. For all of our sakes, maybe it’s time to embrace that pairing in an inspired, more hopeful way.

Writing Prompt: How do you talk with children about the difficult aspects of this world? Despite the brokenness observed and felt, do you try to sell your children on the world in the hopes that they would attempt to make it beautiful? Do you see poetry in medicine? Why or why not? Write for 10 minutes.

Continue Reading

Narrative Medicine Monday: The Burnout Crisis in American Medicine

A recent article in The Atlantic by writer and resident physician Rena Xu highlights the toll rigid regulations and decreasing autonomy takes on medical professionals.  In “The Burnout Crisis in American Medicine,” Xu illustrates the causes of burnout and the consequences of a system that makes it challenging for doctors to do what they were trained to do – care for patients.

In the article, Xu tells the story of a patient admitted to the hospital for cardiac issues. She is then found to have a kidney problem that is in need of a surgical procedure. Unfortunately, the anesthesiologist who tries to book the the surgery finds that the computer system won’t let him schedule it because the patient already had a cardiac study scheduled for the following morning. A computer system issue took hours of Xu’s time, all because “doctors weren’t allowed to change the schedule.”

Xu expresses understandable frustration that her “attention had been consumed by challenges of coordination rather than actual patient care.” I’m sure every medical professional can relate. In today’s healthcare environment, much of the work we do in medicine is clerical and administrative. Xu notes that “doctors become doctors because they want to take care of patients.” Instead, many of our “challenges relate to the operations of medicine–managing a growing number of patients, coordinating care across multiple providers, documenting it all.”

I liked Xu’s analogy of a chef attempting to serve several roles in a restaurant without compromising the quality of the meals. The restaurant owners then ask her to document everything she cooks. There are a bewildering array of options for each ingredient and “she ends up spending more time documenting her preparation than actually preparing the dish. And all the while, the owners are pressuring her to produce more and produce faster.” Any physician who has worked with the ICD-10 coding system can relate.

Xu notes the looming physician shortage in coming decades as the population ages and a large swath of physicians retire: a crisis in its own right. The only remedy is to improve “the workflow of medicine so that physicians are empowered to do their job well and derive satisfaction from it.”

Patients might not realize that “burned-out doctors are more likely to make medical errors, work less efficiently, and refer their patients to other providers, increasing the overall complexity (and with it, the cost) of care.” As patients, we should be fighting for our healthcare organizations to promote a culture and systems of wellness among medical providers. The care we receive depends on it.

Writing Prompt: If you’re a physician, what is greatest stressor in your daily practice? Have you had to make “creative” work-arounds, like the anesthesiologist in Xu’s article, just to do the right thing for your patient? If you’re a patient, have you considered how your physician’s well-being might affect their ability to care for you? What systemic barriers are in the way of addressing this crisis? Write for 10 minutes.

Continue Reading

Narrative Medicine Monday: Out of the Straightjacket

In recent years the importance of physician burnout, depression and the high suicide rate among physicians has become more visible. The New York Times article “Taking Care of the Physician” notes that physicians are “approximately twice the relative risk of suicide compared to people in other professions” and aren’t adequately trained to deal with many of the stressors that being a medical provider entail: “how to deal with conflict, how to deal with negotiation, how to deal with the distress of patients”. We learn the science of medicine but don’t receive enough instruction on the skills that can lead to resiliency in an emotionally grueling profession.

Dr. Michael Weinstein bravely shares his own story of severe depression, subsequent treatment and the struggle he experienced as a surgeon who desperately needed help regarding his mental illness. Weinstein’s essay “Out of the Straitjacket” in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals how he became “profoundly depressed, delirious, and hopeless. He’d lost faith in treatment and in reasons to live.” He describes the brutal hours and culture of residency training and how he went on to become a trauma surgeon, shouldering the emotional toll that intense work can take: “We often make decisions in the face of uncertainty that deeply affect our patients’ lives. When things went wrong, I frequently blamed myself.” Weinstein illustrates the failure in the medical culture to address the frequency of burnout and depression in our profession: “I didn’t know how to talk to my coresidents or faculty about medical mistakes and the accompanying self-flagellation.” He “felt trapped in [his] work and worried that [he] would expose [his] shortcomings if [he] sought a leave or disclosed [his] feelings.” How can we change the stigma associated with such a prevalent scourge on our profession, on so many who suffer from mental illness in this world?

Recent studies on physician wellness point to the fact that “it’s more effective to make changes at the level of the institution, rather than just telling the doctors to shape up in the wellness department.” So many physicians “enter medical school deeply committed to the field, they come with the desire to be empathic and compassionate, if we just create a system that nurtures what they come with then we will have less burnout and higher quality care.” How can we best change our institutions, our culture, to promote wellness in those who care for our health?

Writing Prompt: Do you or a colleague suffer from burnout or depression? How has your institution helped address this issue? How has it failed in addressing this issue? As a patient, what are your thoughts about Dr. McClafferty’s statement in the New York Times article: “If you’re my physician, I want you to be in good shape mentally, physically and emotionally, so you can be really successful at helping me”? If you’ve personally suffered from depression, what stigma did you experience? What was most helpful, from individuals or from your workplace, for recovery? Write for 10 minutes.

If you are suffering from depression or burnout, there is help:

For Physicians: AMA’s Steps Forward

For Patients and Physicians: National Suicide Prevention Lifeline

Continue Reading

Published: Timeline

I’ve tried to write a piece like Timeline several times. It’s simply a chronicle of my typical work day, but, in the past, I never was able to get it just right. It didn’t flow sufficiently, wasn’t a clear reflection of the exhaustion I feel at the end of the day. 

When I discovered Pulse’s “More Voices” column theme this month was “Stress and Burnout,” I felt compelled to finish this piece for submission. It was initially much longer, but I think the confines of the short word count (less than 400) was helpful in honing it to only the necessities. Previous versions of this essay were written in first person or third person. Second person, I’ve discovered, suits the purpose of the piece. My goal is to place the reader in the shoes of the primary care physician, feel the weight of her day, the exhaustion inherent in the constant churn of a general practitioner’s practice. I hope this piece provides a snapshot of a day-in-the-life of a family physician, and evokes a thoughtful reflection on the state of our health care system and the very real crisis of physician burnout. 

I’m grateful to Pulse for publishing Timeline and for their regular promotion of issues relevant to patients and medical providers through narrative medicine poetry and prose.

Writing prompt: When do you feel most stressed at work? When do you feel energized? Have you witnessed signs of burnout in your colleagues or your own medical provider? List your own timeline of a typical workday. How do you feel when you read it back? Write for 10 minutes. 

Continue Reading